Glycan-related Interaction Hotspot Identification Service

Glycan-related Interaction Hotspot Identification Service

Rely on Our Expertise to Identify Interaction Hotspot

Reasonable construction of Interaction Prediction and Validation models between glycans and molecules helps to improve molecular structure stability and prediction accuracy. Characterization, detection, and identification of hotspot regions are key to understanding glycan interactions and functions. Combining molecular docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulations, CD BioGlyco provides glycan-related interaction hotspot identification services, which not only effectively predict glycan-molecule binding sites, but also enable further hotspot analyses of the binding sites.

Integrated information-based interaction hotspot identification

We analyze the interaction sites by collecting and integrating information from databases and screening for interaction hotspots.

Sequence-based interaction hotspot identification

Relying on advanced computational biology techniques, our researchers predict and identify molecular interaction sites by extracting glycan sequence features.

Structure-based interaction hotspot identification

CD BioGlyco provides interaction hotspot identification based on glycan structures or fragments. Our researchers have extensive operational experience in molecular modeling and molecular docking.

Binding free energy-based interaction hotspot identification

Our lab uses computational alanine scanning mutagenesis (ASM) to sequentially mutate interfacial residues to alanine and calculate changes in binding free energy. We provide hotspot residue identification by molecular dynamics simulations.

Our computationalists provide complex binding energy calculations using the molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM-PBSA) method. Based on the change in binding free energy, we provide hotspot residue classification services.

Flowchart of glycan-related interaction hotspot identification. (CD BioGlyco)

Publication

Technology: Molecular dynamics, Molecular docking

Journal: International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Published: 2016

IF: 4.9

Results: In this study, researchers used molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations to predict and validate hot spots at the interface of the Drosophila Su(dx) protein (WW34) protein excipient. The researchers performed molecular dynamics simulations on a fully solvated system. Analysis by trajectory showed that although the conformation changed the interaction with the key recognition residues did not change. The researchers identified and characterized three hotspots for the interaction of the transmembrane glycoprotein A33 with excipients. Hotspot 1 was best suited for sucrose and alginate interactions, hotspot 2 had sugar-amino acid interactions, and hotspot 3 had only surfactant docking. Identifying hotspots of interactions within the space helps in the rapid screening of excipients.

Fig.1 Frontal (left) and side (center)views of the three hotspots for A33-excipient interaction identified.Fig.1 A33-excipient interaction of three hotspots. (Barata, et al., 2016)

Applications

  • Glycan-related interaction hotspot identification plays an important role in drug discovery, e.g., in designing new drugs against specific targets.
  • Glycan-related interaction hotspot identification can be used to develop therapeutic proteins for specific glycosylation binding.
  • Glycan-related interaction hotspot identification provides information on protective glycoprotein-assignor interactions at the molecular level.
  • Glycan-related interaction hotspot identification can be used to distinguish between hotspots and common residues.

Advantages of Us

  • Our researchers have reliable resources and a series of computing tools to meet all the client needs on interaction hotspot identification.
  • We offer interaction hotspot identification not only for natural molecules but also for some protein mutants.
  • High data stability and more reliable identification of interaction hotspots through molecular dynamics simulations.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What is the difference between a hotspot analysis and heat maps?
    • They are both spatial analysis techniques but express different emphases. A heat map is a visual representation of intensity or density, using mainly color changes to distinguish between strengths and weaknesses. Hotspot analysis uses algorithms to identify statistically significant clusters or concentrations of events.
  • How to analyze the simulation results?
    • Our common calculation methods include radius of gyration (RoG) analysis, energy parameter calculations, root mean square deviation (RMSD) calculations, and root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) calculations.

CD BioGlyco has been working in the field of computational glycobiology for many years and has accumulated a wealth of experience to provide the most satisfactory glycan-related interaction hotspot identification solutions for our clients. For any further information, do not hesitate to contact us.

Reference

  1. Barata, T.S.; et al. Identification of protein-excipient interaction hotspots using computational approaches. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016, 17(6): 853.
For research use only. Not intended for any diagnostic use.
Related Services

We envision a future where the intricate world of carbohydrate is no longer shrouded in mystery, but rather illuminated by the power of cutting-edge computational tools.

Get In Touch
  • Location
  • Phone Us
  • Email Us
Copyright © CD BioGlyco. All Rights Reserved.
Inquiry
Top